You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.

The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.

For the reports in this repository we specifically note that

  • the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)

  • the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)

  • technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required

  • in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information

By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.

If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se

Design Gestures. Playing with Â’AffordanceÂ’ and the Concept of Â’DesignÂ’

Research group:


Publication Type:

Conference/Workshop Paper


Abstract

Design from the 1980Â’s, such as Jonas BohlinÂ’s chair Concrete and Ettore Sottsass shelf Carlton, calls for alternative thinking in design theory, in regard to design theoriesÂ’ categorization of functional and non-functional (i.e. aesthetical) objects. For example found in Donald NormanÂ’s theory of the design of everyday things. In these examples from design practice, usefulness seems to be put aside for sensual perception. But these design objects also seem to broaden the concept of Â’designÂ’. Not, however, placing them in the categories of being aesthetic - or art objects. In this paper, I suggest that these artefacts are playing with Â’affordanceÂ’, i.e. with the activity called forth through perception of the object. They also actualize design understood as drawing/sketching, as cognitive tools, hence playing with design both understood as process and final object.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{Carlsson2996,
author = {Anna-Lena Carlsson},
title = {Design Gestures. Playing with {\^A}’Affordance{\^A}’ and the Concept of {\^A}’Design{\^A}’},
month = {May},
year = {2013},
url = {http://www.ipr.mdh.se/publications/2996-}
}