You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.

The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.

For the reports in this repository we specifically note that

  • the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)

  • the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)

  • technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required

  • in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information

By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.

If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se

Performance measurement review practices – a dual perspective case study

Authors:

Mohammed Salloum, Magnus Wiktorsson

Research group:

Product and Production Development

Publication Type:

Conference/Workshop Paper

Venue:

The 21st EurOMA Conference

Abstract

Understanding how change is managed in performance measures (PM) is as important as it is under-researched (Bourne, 2008). The purpose of this paper is to outline the PM review practice and contrast it to theory. The paper is based on two case studies, one with the top-management and one with the rest of the organisation. This paper concludes that the theoretical recommendations are in line with the practical application on an overall level. However, a considerable gap exists between the theoretical soundness of the PM review approach and the competence of executing it.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{Salloum3658,
author = {Mohammed Salloum and Magnus Wiktorsson},
title = {Performance measurement review practices – a dual perspective case study},
month = {June},
year = {2014},
booktitle = {The 21st EurOMA Conference},
url = {http://www.ipr.mdu.se/publications/3658-}
}