You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.

The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.

For the reports in this repository we specifically note that

  • the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)

  • the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)

  • technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required

  • in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information

By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.

If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se

Storyboard - Framing and reframing the design brief

Research group:


Publication Type:

Conference/Workshop Paper

Venue:

20th International Product Development Management Conference


Abstract

This paper presents findings from an explanatory experiment, developing understanding about Storyboarding in the front front end of innovation. The experiment set-up is to test how Storyboard is different from the common way of working before creating a design brief, writing documents, and to create a research agenda in order to explore this phenomena in depth. The experiment was performed in the context of a multidisciplinary concept development course with eight teams. These teams were divided in two groups where one group created a Storyboard brief and the other a written brief. As results three hypotheses are developed for further research. Also we conclude that Storyboard seems to be more promising to support innovation projects that need focusing in a narrower area, but in that area more open to freedom of interpretation and reframing of a problem at its roots.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{Wikstrom2984,
author = {Anders Wikstr{\"o}m and Roberto Verganti},
title = {Storyboard - Framing and reframing the design brief},
isbn = { },
month = {June},
year = {2013},
booktitle = {20th International Product Development Management Conference},
url = {http://www.ipr.mdh.se/publications/2984-}
}